Prologic Web Solutions Private Limited through its director Mayank Jain, owns the trademark for GST Suvidha Kendra® and GST Suvidha Center®. Anyone selling/ buying the licence other than Prologic Web Solutions Private Limited is illegal under the Trademarks Act 1999 and will be prosecuted under the provisions of Trademark Act 1999.

Contributing to Indian Economy

  • GST Suvidha Kendra®

  • H-183, Sector 63, Noida

  • 09:00 - 21:00

  • Everyday

Loop Holes to be found in GST

Contact Us

Loop Holes to be found in GST

Loop Holes in GST

Loop Holes to be found in GST

gst suvidha kendra ads banner

Goods and Services Tax (GST) was introduced within the country to beat the matter of corruption arising out of the old system like customs, nuisance tax, and octroi. It had been hoped that this is able to bring transparency within the system and curb corruption, but today it’s been restored. Number two is being openly traded. Two parallel systems are formed within the country. An appointment is a paper that appears during a computer.

The second computer operates outside. The entrepreneur buys raw materials in number two, buys electricity in number two, hires workers in number two, and sells goods in number two. The trucker delivers the products to the shopkeeper in number two and therefore the shopkeeper also sells to customers in number two. However, to curb this corruption, the govt made an appointment of the e-way bill, in order that it is often checked on the way whether tax has been paid on goods.

But some corrupt businessmen have broken this too. Today, an e-way bill is moving goods several times. for instance, the E-way bill from Delhi to Faridabad features a duration of 24 hours. During this period, goods are being transported fourfold. Just one occasion transportation giving GST and 3 times freight number two. GST is additionally being stolen through other means.

As many traders are saving tax by declaring a lower value of products. Many are showing the acquisition of raw materials at a better rate of GST than the sale of finished goods with lower rates. like the acquisition of rubber with 18 percent GST and therefore the sale of sandal with five percent GST and showed a refund of GST difference of 13 percent between them. Number two.

GST is additionally being stolen through other means. As many traders are saving tax by declaring a lower value of products. Many are showing the acquisition of raw materials at a better rate of GST than the sale of finished goods with lower rates. like the acquisition of rubber with 18 percent GST and therefore the sale of sandal with five percent GST and showed a refund of GST difference of 13 percent between them. Number two. GST is additionally being stolen through other means. As many traders are saving tax by declaring a lower value of products.

Many are showing the acquisition of raw materials at a better rate of GST than the sale of finished goods with lower rates. like the acquisition of rubber with 18 percent GST and therefore the sale of sandal with five percent GST and showed a refund of GST difference of 13 percent between them.

All these fake activities can’t be stopped only with technology. If an entrepreneur buys staple in number two and sells it in number two, the officer will need to go and check it on the spot. The pc cannot investigate this. If freight is being loaded on an e-way bill thrice, the officer can disclose it only by questioning the driving force.

These flaws within the GST aren’t being removed because some officials are more curious about taking bribes. during this sequence, the govt has made up its mind to form the system of fast tag mandatory with the e-way bill, in order that the amount of times the truck crosses the barrier should even be available with the govt, but by doing, therefore, the corruption on the barrier also A path will open. Ultimately, to prevent GST evasion, the govt will need to curb tax authorities in how.

It is good that the govt has taken many effective steps during this direction. Many officials are dismissed, but it’s becoming harder for the govt to spot other corrupt officials. Obviously, the govt will need to believe it during a new way. Some studies may prove helpful during this regard.

First, Professor John Joseph Wallis of the University of Maryland has stated that us Constitution makers had given special emphasis to raising the voice of the general public. like ensuring public representation, facilitating public access to officials and leaders, maintaining fairness in government work, etc. that’s why corruption is a smaller amount within the American bureaucracy.

Their focus wasn’t to run the system from the highest but to form surveillance on the system accessible by the general public from below. Second, World Development magazine in one of its articles reviewed anti-corruption systems within the world. It found that ‘anti-corruption’ institutions are unsuccessful, but corruption ‘audit’ is successful. Actually, corruption takes place with the mutual consent of the bribe and giver. Therefore, anti-corruption institutions are effective as long as something goes wrong between the 2, but the audit means the investigating officer should attend the office of the corporate concerned to research.

The thief leaves clues of theft, but this audit also will achieve success as long as the govt appoints an outdoor auditor. But the audit meant that the investigating officer should attend the office of the concerned company and conduct an investigation.
The thief leaves clues of theft, but this audit also will achieve success as long as the govt appoints an outdoor auditor.

Third, Errol D’Souza of the Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad, says that the press, civil society, and therefore the courts have a crucial role in curbing corruption. For instance, if the press is strengthened, they question the actions of corrupt officials and ministers. If the courts are strengthened, they curb both corrupt officials and ministers. Since this makes governments themselves vulnerable, it’s often been seen that they pressurize the press, civil society, and courts in order that ministers aren’t questioned. Fourth, the advice of the Fifth Pay Commission said that the increment should be implemented as long as the Group-A officers are evaluated on an external basis every five years.

Since equivalent officers were to implement the Fifth Pay Commission. in order that they have implemented the recommendations of salary hike, But the advice of external evaluation was placed on hold. Their conclusion is that not only can the govt fix the system, but it requires the active participation of the govt from the highest and also from rock bottom. If the general public participation from below increases, then people also will ask inquiries to the govt. Ministers will need to answer themselves. This may bring transparency within the system and control corruption prevailing in it. Ultimately, this may curb the fraud in GST.

gst suvidha kendra ads banner

Share this post?

Anurag Srivastva
Wish to Earn 50,000 Rs/Month ?Download Free Business Proposal
Download Now
Shares